Humanitarian Emergency: All Eyes on Rafah
Introduction
A further escalation of Israeli military operations in southern Gaza will inevitably kill more Palestinians. Here’s why.
In around seven months, Rafah in Southern Gaza functioned as a refuge for more than 1.5 million Palestinians, where over 36,000 people have been killed so far. This changed when Israel forces intensified their military operations in Rafah, leaving people into constant fear of death in a war they would be insulated from in the south.
Following the issuance of evacuation orders and escalated their military activities in Rafah, they seized control of Rafah crossing and closed it until further notice, blocking people’s access to lifesaving goods and supplies and making it near impossible for humanitarian organizations to sustain lifesaving operations.
On May 26, at least 45 people have been killed and 250 were wounded when an Israel airstrike hit the neighborhood of Tal Al-Sultan in Rafah including women and children. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said it had killed two “senior Hamas terrorists” and that it was “investigasting the circumstances of the deaths of civilians in the area”. Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu called it a “tragedy”.
Legal issue: “What are the implications of the ICJ’s ruling on Israel’s Rafah offensive?”
Analysis
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the UN’s highest court, issued a ruling regarding Israel’s military actions in Rafah. Since the case began, the court has made several contentious rulings, with the most significant ones addressing whether there is a risk of genocide in Gaza. The ruling on May 24 included controversial language about the military operations in Rafah and is now the subject of intense debate.
In its recent order, the court decided by a 13-to-2 vote that Israel should “immediately halt its military offensive and any other actions in the Rafah Governorate that might create conditions of life for the Palestinian people in Gaza that could lead to their physical destruction, in whole or in part.” Some headlines suggested this was a command to cease all military operations in Rafah, but there are differing interpretations among the judges.
Supporters of the ruling might argue that it is a necessary measure to protect Palestinian civilians and prevent further escalation of violence in Gaza. They may view the ICJ’s decision as a critical step toward holding Israel accountable for its actions and addressing the humanitarian crisis in the region.
Read also: Asian Copyright Hand Book Indonesian Version
Critics, on the other hand, might contend that the ruling is overly simplistic and fails to consider the security concerns faced by Israel. They may argue that the decision could hinder Israel’s ability to defend itself against threats from militant groups operating in Gaza, potentially exacerbating the conflict.
Ultimately, this ruling from the ICJ brings to the forefront the ongoing struggle to balance humanitarian concerns with security imperatives in one of the world’s most enduring conflicts. It also emphasizes the role of international legal bodies in mediating such disputes, though their influence and the implementation of their rulings remain subjects of intense debate.
Conclusion
The International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) recent decision on Israel’s military operations in Rafah has sparked considerable debate and varying interpretations among the judges. While the court ruled that Israel must stop any actions in Rafah that could potentially lead to the physical destruction of Palestinians, opinions differ on the clarity and implications of this directive. Some judges highlight Israel’s right to self-defense, while others argue that the ruling clearly mandates an end to the offensive. This situation underscores the complexity and contentious nature of the case, emphasizing the court’s limited role in resolving the broader conflict.
References
Thomas Mackintosh, David Gritten, BBC News, “Dozens reported killed in Israeli strike on Rafah”, May 2024
MSF, “What’s happening in Rafah?”, May 2024
Dominic Casciani, BBC News, “What does the ICJ’s ruling on Israel’s Rafah offensive mean?”, May 2024
